

brenton777 wrote:I have to agree w/ BD666 on this one....watch the fight again

emjay wrote:brenton777 wrote:I have to agree w/ BD666 on this one....watch the fight again
Sure, "The only reason the fight was a draw is because Tito Ortiz LOST a point." - I'll give you that, but the problem with saying that is that there is an assumption that Tito would have won the fight had he not lost that point. When you make that assumption, you then have to take away the fact that Tito grabbed the fence to keep from going down which would have completely changed the fight from that point on.
If you can't understand that, I don't know what to tell ya

|
|


emjay wrote:brenton777 wrote:I have to agree w/ BD666 on this one....watch the fight again
Sure, "The only reason the fight was a draw is because Tito Ortiz LOST a point." - I'll give you that, but the problem with saying that is that there is an assumption that Tito would have won the fight had he not lost that point. When you make that assumption, you then have to take away the fact that Tito grabbed the fence to keep from going down which would have completely changed the fight from that point on.
If you can't understand that, I don't know what to tell ya
mistavengeance wrote:This is one of the basic mistakes I've been seeing people make in analyzing the Evans-Machida fight. Based on Evans' fight with Ortiz, they say his wrestling is weaker than Machida's because he couldn't take Ortiz down. However, as emjay points out, he couldn't take Tito down because he was grabbing the fence! That's why that shit is illegal! Furthermore, Evans DID take Ortiz down in the 3rd round!
Do NOT be surprised if Evans gets on top of Machida.

BlackDragon666 wrote:Let me make this simple for you:
Tito lost a point for grabbing the fence (one time). Because of that, the fight was a draw. That means that had he not grabbed the fence, the point would have not been taken, and Tito would have won.
BlackDragon666 wrote:Now, if your suggesting that if Tito hadn't grabbed the fence and Rashad had taken him down which would have gotten Rashad more points, then I don't disagree with that. But its an assumption at best. Rashad might have scored enough with that takedown to win, he might not have. Its a moot point. The fact is that the loss of 1 point was the difference between Tito winning and Rashad losing.


Users browsing this forum: 00Buckshot, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 3 guests